Hershman Testifies Before State Senate on Outreach Cuts
The following testimony was delivered
by Larry Hershman, UC vice president
for budget, before a California
Senate committee hearing on
Dec. 10, 2003, regarding proposals
for mid-year cuts to university
outreach programs.
These cuts are devastating.
Let me be clear about the current
year. We have no way to make the
cuts we were already allocated
in the budget act -- a 50 percent
cut of $33 million. Another $12 million
on top of that is just adding to
an already impossible task.
Although you are not addressing
the 2004 portion of these cuts
at this point, the proposal is
to eliminate all state funding
for outreach.Such
a disinvestment in the future of so
many children seems to
be the opposite of what we should
be doing at this point. We’ve
seen published information
from opponents of these programs
that describe them as nothing
but
expensive marketing or recruitment
programs for the university.
We disagree strongly with that
characterization.
These programs primarily serve
students attending low-performing
schools, providing them with academic
assistance (tutoring, homework
skills building, mentoring) to
try to help level the playing field
for those students. Because of
the schools they go to, and because
they are generally from families
who have never sent anyone to college,
most of these students don't do
on their own what's necessary to
achieve eligibility for UC.
The purpose of our programs is
to try to provide the
academic assistance these students
need to go to college. We
regard it as a success not only
if they go to UC, but also if they
go to CSU, or even to Harvard!
Given demographic trends facing California in the near future,
it makes no sense to
totally abandon
these students to overcome
the disadvantages they face on their
own.
We've been discussing this issue
and these cuts with
chancellors, regents, others
throughout the university. At
the Council of Chancellors meeting
last week, the chancellors unanimously
agreed that outreach is core
to the university's mission.
Our programs are working with well
over 100,000 participants to help
them get on track, and stay on
track, to do what's necessary to
become eligible. It is in the best
interest of this state to help
more and more of these students
to get on a four-year college path.
Especially when we have programs
to help them that we know work.
Vice
President Winston Doby appeared before your
committee last year to talk
about the success of these programs.
I have the handouts from that
presentation as well as copies
of our annual report that document the success
of our efforts. He will welcome
the opportunity to testify
again this year to help you understand
the importance of these
programs to the university.
As we reported to you last spring,
nearly
half of the underrepresented
students entering UC students are participants
in these programs. Eligibility, application, and enrollment
rates for
students
participating in these programs are increasing
each year.
An independent study of the EAOP
program found that participants are twice as likely to complete
UC college
preparatory coursework as their non-EAOP counterparts.
This definitive
study incorporated a control group and spanned several
years,
encompassing more than 40,000 California
high school students. Among students completing the MESA
program,
71 percent go on to attend college. It has received national recognition
for its achievements.
We hope to convince the governor
and
the Legislature that state funding for outreach must be preserved. We'd be
happy to answer any questions
you may have.